On The True Nature, and Social and Psychological Functions of Colleges, Universities, and their so-called Teachers and Students

I have read the vast majority, of the theories and so-called findings of academics, and the vast majority of what the vast majority write and say, about human psychology, society, and human nature, is full of myths, lies, and wildly inaccurate. It is also driven by a very sycophantic and submissive underlying desire and tendency, for most academics to very blindly obey and serve the main so-called mainstream, and very outdated and stunted cultural and political ideologies, and the views and theories which most academics dictate and believe in, are simply slight variations of the views of other academics.

Indeed, one old friend of mine, said that if you wanted to study sociology or psychology, in terms of an approach which is critical about the abuse, labelling, prejudice, and discrimination, against people diagnosed with so-called mental health problems, then you have to get very friendly and favourable, with certain teachers who teach this at university, and which is like the fagging system in public schools.

In terms of the kind of relatedness, class-hierarchy, and so-called relationships, between students and teachers at colleges and universities, it is very much a master-slave type relationship, where the students are only allowed to have their own findings, theories, and views, as an adherence and "choice" between different academic theories, views, and opinions - and if the students do really question anything, think for themselves, and have their own very genuine findings, theories, views, and opinions - they are seen as very bad students or trouble-makers, by the other students and teachers.

Strangely enough, anyone outside the college and university circus and theatre, who genuine knows much more and much better, than all of these academics and teachers put together, is seen by the students, not as their master, but as their slave. This is curious and interesting, because I find the idea of being the students’ very wise and knowledgeable slave in this way, both erotic, strangely complimentary, and very exciting. This also shows us and very much reveals, the way students have been very repressed, in terms of the power-relationships between them and their teachers and lecturers, and that they secretly have no real grovelling respect, for their so-called academic masters and teachers.

There are some very good academics about, like Irving Goffman, and especially Dave Harper, who is a psychology lecturer in an East End London university, but Dave is one in a billion, and are aren’t very many academics around like him. Whilst Dave does write some genuinely great and innovative psychology articles, he has some very reductionist and black and white opinions about all psychiatric medication, and even his overall views and findings are still very much incomplete, and in some ways very inaccurate. I will send this article to Dave Harper, and very politely ask him for his views and opinions about it.

The truth and whole social nature and psychology of academics, is that they are regarded and treated, as kinds of magical gurus and royalty, and insulated and secluded from the reality of human experiences and behaviours in actual society, and in this way they are given an overall undeserved privileged status and respect, for this magical knowledge and power, and for the fact that they are really being given very preferential treatment, for being very subservient and ignorant.